Agreed 100% I wish women would get over the whole tattoo thing! Why can they not let us guys have just one thing to call our own! Women can change their appearence in a million ways that guys cannot but still they insist on getting tattoos as well! Tattoos are litterally the ONE thing that look better on men than women but still they can't let us have them.
I strongly disagree about that! Yes men can change their appearance in lots of ways, but if they do they are ridiculed, mocked and quite often discriminated against for each one! It is not a question about being bold, Men can actually be attacked in the street for dressing or looking different! That is very rarely the case for women! And in any case I think tattoos in general look terrible on women! As I said tattoos are litterally the ONE thing that look better on men than women so why can they not just leave them to us!
"Men can actually be attacked in the street for dressing or looking different!" simply bigotry and people being extremists in their idiology
the rest is just your opinion ...
pretty simple none shall be ever limited in his freedom everyone shall do whatever he wants without damaging anyone else physically, psycologicaly, finacialy, materialy or in dignity
if someone dresses in womencloses for instance what shall that matter to me personally? that person has no ressemblence to who or what i am so why should i care? ... as long as he doesn´t delibratly provoke, harrass or offend me there is no issue ...
1. sheer fabric 2. sultry gaze 3. shapely, slim model 4. areola slip ( yes, i can see areola. don't argue with me about it because i know it's there. ) 5. garters 6. excessive amount of visible skin
clothing like this was designed to appeal to a certain group of people because it's sexually enticing. it's a fetish clothing, and this is fetish photography.
i find it annoying because there are people on here who spend hours- days- maybe even weeks or months on traditional and digital art pieces and then photographs like this show up on the front page. okay, sure, it costed a lot of money ( maybe ) to get that outfit/have it custom made/etc and the camera probably cost a lot of money too, but really. i'm fine with photography- i take photos myself and i adore photography, but things like this on the front page just seems so pointless. furthermore it seems like the only reason this is on the front page is because of the amount of attention it's getting from horny/devious individuals. ( not devious as in the website, devious as in the actual term )
i'd be fine seeing a lovely photograph of a tree on the side of the hill overlooking a serene pond or even some kind of artistic underwater shot with a model dressed appropriately for the scene ( in costume or swim suit, whatever, ) but seeing photography specifically geared toward sexual gratification is just stupid to me when it's on the front page of this site.
If You call this fetish I presume You are new to the internet.
1. and? Summer dress is also one piece of fabric. 2. if She looked grumpy, sad, or tried not to show any emotions some people would complain about that fact too. 3. would You rather prefer a skinny-bone thing or an obese woman? Well, you have the right to have personal preferences, so have others. 4. Had to zoom in like 3 times to see it. I'm also pretty sure that if You would take an infrared photo, or edit some regular ones in photoshop, You would see nipples even under a burqa. Those slutty woman, how dare they show their bodies like that!!11111 D: 5. Some time ago it was considered "fetish" not to wear one under a dress... Garter belt technically covers more skin than g-strings alone (wich is what a lot woman wear today, w/o the garter and stockings). 6. That's good for one's health, exposing skin to the sun and elements keeps it healthy and allows the body to produce vitamin D.